The report from online training provider High Speed Training, which analysed Food Standards Agency (FSA) data for over 240,000 food businesses across England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, found that in the South East, the average food hygiene rating across all food establishments was 4.60 from 29,031 premises, which places the region joint fourth in the national rankings.
A similar report run in 2024 by High Speed Training calculated the South East’s score at 4.61, showing that food hygiene standards have seen a slight dip across the region.
he top spot in the South East went to Hastings, with an impressive average score of 4.86 from almost 400 premises, placing them joint-fourth in the national rankings for towns and cities. Hastings also held the top spot in the region in 2024, and its rating increased by 0.02.
The lowest average rating in the South East went to Woking, with an average score of 4.27.
Chichester saw the greatest improvement in the region, improving its rating by 0.12 to 4.81.
The average rating for Woking fell more than any other town or city in the region, both losing 0.14 from their average rating in 2024.
High Speed Training’s report also found that 16.3% of takeaways across the region scored 3 or below for their food hygiene rating, and that 90.3% of premises scored a 4 or a 5 on their rating.
The report also found that 42 premises across the region scored a zero, and 354 scored a one on their food hygiene rating.
The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) is a partnership with local authorities in England, Wales and Northern Ireland that was launched in 2010.
It replaced a number of regional schemes, with the aim of providing hygiene information clearly and more effectively across the UK.
Following regular inspections, ratings are devised based on the standard of food handling hygiene, the physical condition of the premises and facilities and food safety management practices.
These ratings are then made available on the Food Standards Agency (FSA) website and are usually visible from outside of the premises, often presented in a window near the entrance.
In Wales and Northern Ireland, it is compulsory for businesses to display their food hygiene rating. However, in England it is currently just considered best practice.
Paul Turner CEnvH, MCIEH, an environmental health officer for North Yorkshire Council, said: “Since its inception 15 years ago, the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme has played a pivotal role in improving standards across the UK.
“It has been incredibly successful in allowing local authorities and EHOs to effectively engage with both businesses and consumers to communicate important messages around food hygiene and safety.
“Prior to the launch, a number of regional ‘Scores on the Doors’ schemes existed that, though they were effective, didn’t easily allow for national comparison and benchmarking.
“A national standard means greater consistency for businesses and provides the public easy access to this vital information.
“However, we would welcome some updates to the FHRS to make it more suitable for the current landscape, which relies heavily on food delivery apps and aggregators.
“We would like to see this information displayed more prominently across these apps, perhaps with a traffic light system for easy identification.
“We are also always pushing to make the display of food hygiene ratings in England mandatory, as it is in Wales and Northern Ireland, to ensure that consumers have all the information they need to make informed choices about where to spend their hard-earned money.”
Dr Richard Anderson, head of learning and development at High Speed Training said: “Food safety and robust hygiene practices should be of paramount importance to food businesses, and to the customers who use them.
“Fifteen years have passed since the launch of the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme, and its place in the industry is as vital as ever.
“These ratings are a direct reflection of how safely and hygienically that establishment operates, and we urge businesses and customers to take them seriously.
“For businesses that perform well, a high rating is a real selling point. However, establishments with a low hygiene rating can be extremely off-putting for customers, which ultimately have a significant impact on reputation and profitability.
“Our report shows that, on average, standards remain high across the UK, and have improved from 2024.
“This commitment to correct food hygiene training for staff, alongside robust food management procedures and everyday good practices are crucial to keep performing at high standards.
“We would also urge customers to check the food hygiene ratings of establishments they wish to dine at, so that an informed call as to whether you eat there can be made.”
You can view the full rankings and ratings for the featured towns and cities in Sussex and Surrey below.

1. The best and worst places in Sussex and Surrey for food hygiene ratings revealed
The towns and cities across Sussex and Surrey that score highest and lowest for their food hygiene ratings have been revealed. Photo: Contributed

2. Hastings
Hastings, ranked first in the South East, has the highest rating of 4.86. The change in rating from 2024 was an increase of 0.02 Photo: Historic England Archive/Heritage Images via Getty Images

3. Chichester
Chichester, ranked 3rd in the South East, had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.12. Its average rating in 2024 was 4.69 Photo: English Heritage/Heritage Images/Getty Images

4. Crawley
Crawley, ranked fourth, had the joint-biggest improvement in ranking, alongside Chichester, moving up three positions from their 2024 rank of seventh Photo: Historic England Archive/Heritage Images via Getty Images